This site uses cookies.     
You are not logged in. Please login.

Apt Pupil (1998)



 Download


IMDb 6.7/10  (39 687) RFF 6.8/10  (10)

Rating:
6.6

Sensitive scenes: 1 (1m 47s)
Keywords: boy-nudity, boy-shower-scene
Nudity: 5/10

Country: USA  France
Director: Bryan Singer
Runtime: 111 minutes

10
20
30
40
50
1
10
20
30
40
50


After the gym, Todd (Brad Renfro, 16) takes a shower. You see the bottoms of the students in the school.
Nudity: 5
Points: 5
Actors and Actresses age nudity
frontal rear chest
Brad Renfro
16 years oldpartial

Time: 0:24:38-0:26:25 (1m 47s)
added: 2009 October, 22 | modified: 2021 January, 15

Behind the scenes


April 16 was not a good day for director Bryan Singer. On his way to the Sherman Oaks, Calif., set of Apt Pupil, his first film since The Usual Suspects, he got a flat tire on the Pacific Coast Highway. He dragged himself through a long shooting day while suffering from the flu and didn’t take a break until 6 p.m. And when he sat down to dinner with screenwriter Brandon Boyce, a crew member whispered some very bad news in his ear: A 14-year-old extra named Devin St. Albin had filed a lawsuit claiming that the filmmakers had ordered him and other minors to strip for a scene that was shot in the showers of a school locker room.
Singer excused himself from the table, conferred with the producers, and decided to return to work. But a few hours later, after trying to film a technically difficult shot, he gave up. ”I’m about to die,” he said.
Two weeks earlier, on the morning of April 2, a dozen-odd extras had arrived at the gymnasium of Altadena’s Elliot Middle School to shoot a scene from Apt Pupil, the Stephen King adaptation starring Brad Renfro as a teenager obsessed with a Nazi war criminal (Ian McKellen). What actually happened after the extras entered the locker room has now become the subject of two lawsuits — two more boys are now supporting St. Albin’s claim — and the centerpiece of an ongoing argument about the rights and welfare of child actors.
According to St. Albin, a 17-year-old plaintiff named Ryan Glomboske, and Peter Gordon, the attorney for a third minor, 16-year-old David Stockdale, the boys — local high school athletes recruited by the production — were asked to bring bathrobes to the set to film a nightmare sequence in which shower stalls turn into gas chambers. While the parents of the minors sat in the gym, the extras — who ranged in age from adolescents to geriatrics — were led into a locker room and instructed to change into sheer peach-colored G-strings provided by the wardrobe department. ”Nobody really said anything, but we looked at each other. We were uncomfortable,” says St. Albin. ”You could hear everyone saying ‘What the heck is that?”’ Glomboske remembers. ”People were nervous.”
According to St. Albin and Glomboske (who is joining his suit), the extras, wearing their robes over the G-strings, were ushered past the parents into the shower-room set, where they were told to take off their bathrobes. Then, say St. Albin and Glomboske, they were asked by assistant directors Fernando Altschul and Tom DeSantos to remove their G-strings.
”I looked around for help, for someone to say, ‘There are minors here,”’ says St. Albin. ”I raised my hand and said I wasn’t comfortable. The assistant director looked very upset and said, ‘I guess we can switch you with this other kid.’ They gave me a towel to put on over the G-string” and moved him out of clear sight, next to the lockers.
Glomboske says that he moved closer to a shower head to shield himself but, unlike the other extras, did not remove his G-string. After filming the scene, Glomboske says he was approached by a frustrated assistant director, who asked him why he hadn’t undressed. ”I said I was a minor,” says Glomboske, who asserts that after an informal conference between crew members about what one of them called ”a minor problem,” he was assured that it was not illegal for him to be filmed nude.
But Glomboske says legalities weren’t foremost on his mind at the moment he was asked to unclothe. “If they had taken me aside, it would have been one thing,” says Glomboske. But “they got frustrated and came back and asked me in front of everyone if I minded taking it off. I felt like I would have been a wuss if I hadn’t.” All three teenagers are claiming trauma from the experience, charging the filmmakers with, among other things, infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and invasion of privacy.
(https://ew.com/article/1997/05/02/indecent-proposal-set-apt-pupil/)





WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please help us to complete descriptions for 1172 unrated movies.

Our progress

5038 of 6210 movies have been fully described (81.13%)


User contributions for last 24 hours:
 accepted: 1
 canceled: 0
⏲ in queue: 15



Top 10 Movies
1. Prahaar: The Final Attack (1991)
Rating:
10.000
2. Tears of the Amazon (2010)
Rating:
9.998
3. Foudre (2007)
Rating:
9.996
4. Flossie (1974)
Rating:
9.994
5. Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma (1975)
Rating:
9.992
6. Ultimo mondo cannibale (1977)
Rating:
9.990
7. Vild på sex (1974)
Rating:
9.988
8. Nesmluvená setkání (1995)
Rating:
9.986
9. Tom et Lola (1990)
Rating:
9.984
10. Los abandonados - Die Niemandskinder von Camanducaia (1984)
Rating:
9.982

more

Top.Mail.Ru